Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 50100 for our.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
condition. Welch was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
condition. Welch was advised of his right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259364 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256687 - 2020-03-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256687 - 2020-03-17
State v. Michael J. Modrow
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10204 - 2005-03-31
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10204 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael J. Modrow
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10202 - 2005-03-31
, it granted the state's petition for review, summarily reversed our decision in Modrow, and denied Modrow's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this court, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. On our review of the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
of this court, counsel has filed a supplemental no-merit report. On our review of the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962535 - 2025-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153294 - 2017-09-21
se, appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision to revoke his extended supervision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199266 - 2017-11-01
decision to revoke his extended supervision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199266 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207057 - 2018-01-11
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207057 - 2018-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
based upon a “new factor.” Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2018AP568-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243414 - 2019-07-10
based upon a “new factor.” Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2018AP568-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243414 - 2019-07-10