Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and thus she should be permitted to withdraw it. She further asserts that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
and thus she should be permitted to withdraw it. She further asserts that her trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Gary D. Perry
of a Child, see § 948.02(2), STATS., and the trial court's order denying him postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10449 - 2017-09-20
of a Child, see § 948.02(2), STATS., and the trial court's order denying him postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10449 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Davis argues that the trial court denied Davis his right to confrontation by not allowing trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303623 - 2020-11-17
Davis argues that the trial court denied Davis his right to confrontation by not allowing trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303623 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate two of his three potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058378 - 2026-01-06
alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate two of his three potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058378 - 2026-01-06
State v. Randolph Scott
argues: (1) that the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
argues: (1) that the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melvin F. Koehler v. Barbara J. Koehler
proceeds.1 On appeal, Barbara makes numerous arguments. First, Barbara disputes the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14202 - 2014-09-15
proceeds.1 On appeal, Barbara makes numerous arguments. First, Barbara disputes the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of child pornography were dismissed and read in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34641 - 2014-09-15
of child pornography were dismissed and read in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34641 - 2014-09-15
State v. Linda D.
, Chrishambie, Chifawndie, Chontanite, and Cory. She claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
, Chrishambie, Chifawndie, Chontanite, and Cory. She claims: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph Scott
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Scott argues: (1) that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Scott argues: (1) that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of divorce, arguing that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by awarding (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125162 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of divorce, arguing that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by awarding (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125162 - 2017-09-21