Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22201 - 22210 of 65601 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 22201 - 22210 of 65601 for divorce records/1000.
Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
are adequate and supported by the evidence in the record. At the November 15, 1999 hearing, DeValk testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16338 - 2005-03-31
are adequate and supported by the evidence in the record. At the November 15, 1999 hearing, DeValk testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16338 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel H. Warp
review of the record, we conclude that any further proceedings in this matter would be wholly frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14337 - 2014-09-15
review of the record, we conclude that any further proceedings in this matter would be wholly frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court concluded that the record contained substantial and credible evidence supporting LIRC’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150281 - 2017-09-21
court concluded that the record contained substantial and credible evidence supporting LIRC’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This court has considered the no- merit report, and we have independently reviewed the records. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212416 - 2018-05-03
. This court has considered the no- merit report, and we have independently reviewed the records. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212416 - 2018-05-03
State v. Rocky J. Shaw
because nothing in the record indicated that the children heard the second conversation or were capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
because nothing in the record indicated that the children heard the second conversation or were capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
objected. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
objected. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254441 - 2020-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
also consider a variety of secondary factors including the defendant’s past record of criminal offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
also consider a variety of secondary factors including the defendant’s past record of criminal offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64983 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91979 - 2014-09-15
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded, upon our independent review of the record, that no other issues of arguable merit existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
concluded, upon our independent review of the record, that no other issues of arguable merit existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mary F.-R.
the record on appeal for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached, but did not. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
the record on appeal for evidence to sustain a verdict that the jury could have reached, but did not. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31