Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 30242 for de.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. John Allen
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5695 - 2017-09-19
facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5695 - 2017-09-19
James C. Thomson v. United Water Services Milwaukee, LLC
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5647 - 2005-03-31
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5647 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
State v. Pedro Figueroa
are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 25, 496 N.W.2d 96 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis. 2d 1, 25, 496 N.W.2d 96 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
We review de novo the grant or denial of a summary judgment, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31018 - 2007-12-03
We review de novo the grant or denial of a summary judgment, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31018 - 2007-12-03
Buena Vista Shores Marina v. Michael B. Poston
granting summary judgment. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25628 - 2006-06-27
granting summary judgment. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25628 - 2006-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Eddie McAttee
the trial court’s denial of McAttee’s motion to suppress evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3149 - 2017-09-19
the trial court’s denial of McAttee’s motion to suppress evidence, we determine de novo whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jeanette E. Normington v. Peter J. Normington
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a statute is a question of law, reviewed de novo. State v. Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36247 - 2014-09-15
of a statute is a question of law, reviewed de novo. State v. Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36247 - 2014-09-15