Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 29712 for des.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 29712 for des.
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2203 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2204 - 2005-03-31
Maureen Rainer v. Jerome C. Gathier
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farm v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2426 - 2007-01-08
Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Springs Farm v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2426 - 2007-01-08
State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts—which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2011-10-19
of statutes and their application to the facts—which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
Diane Haddican-Czestler v. Mitchell J. Barrock
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2013-11-19
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2013-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court had authority to act is a question of law that we review de novo. Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-05-02
court had authority to act is a question of law that we review de novo. Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29404 - 2007-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
and did not return her to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
and did not return her to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
2007 WI APP 169
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article I of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29338 - 2007-07-24
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article I of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29338 - 2007-07-24