Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 57708 for id.
Search results 22211 - 22220 of 57708 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
information at sentencing presents a question of law that we decide independently of the circuit court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144513 - 2015-07-21
information at sentencing presents a question of law that we decide independently of the circuit court. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144513 - 2015-07-21
State v. Joachim E. Dressler
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
State v. Charles G. Campbell
suggestive. Id. If the defendant meets this burden, the burden shifts to the State to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2008-05-18
suggestive. Id. If the defendant meets this burden, the burden shifts to the State to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2008-05-18
State v. Frank Machado
counsel claims in his direct appeal. See id. at 185, 517 N.W.2d at 163. The question of the assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7858 - 2008-06-15
counsel claims in his direct appeal. See id. at 185, 517 N.W.2d at 163. The question of the assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7858 - 2008-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
most favorable to the verdict. Id. at 504. If the evidence permits more than one reasonable inference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36515 - 2009-05-19
most favorable to the verdict. Id. at 504. If the evidence permits more than one reasonable inference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36515 - 2009-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
existed. See id. “The legal determination of reasonable suspicion is an objective test: ‘What would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062911 - 2026-01-21
existed. See id. “The legal determination of reasonable suspicion is an objective test: ‘What would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062911 - 2026-01-21
State v. Darnell Jackson
a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. Id. at 636-37, 369 N.W.2d at 716. Prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7756 - 2005-03-31
a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. Id. at 636-37, 369 N.W.2d at 716. Prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7756 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must demonstrate that the lawyer’s errors were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
.” Id., 466 U.S. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must demonstrate that the lawyer’s errors were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106035 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
the wide range of professionally competent assistance,” see id., 466 U.S. at 690, and to prove resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25
the wide range of professionally competent assistance,” see id., 466 U.S. at 690, and to prove resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94401 - 2013-03-25
State v. Anthony A. Parker
that follow. Id. This requirement is satisfied when the defendant is informed of direct consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31
that follow. Id. This requirement is satisfied when the defendant is informed of direct consequences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31