Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22221 - 22230 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22221 - 22230 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Randy L. Burke, Sr.
for a physical examination. Burke claims that the trial court erred in denying these motions because: (1) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10657 - 2005-03-31
for a physical examination. Burke claims that the trial court erred in denying these motions because: (1) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10657 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, he claims, there is a new factor that affects what his sentence should be. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72642 - 2011-10-24
, he claims, there is a new factor that affects what his sentence should be. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72642 - 2011-10-24
Clarence Werner v. Wayne Nohelty
Werner, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. Werner claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31
Werner, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. Werner claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim for plea withdrawal based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Nevertheless, having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
to a claim for plea withdrawal based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Nevertheless, having
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812047 - 2024-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Allan D. Schopper
, NO. 96-3213 4 Schopper’s claim of a constitutional violation because of the delay in scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
, NO. 96-3213 4 Schopper’s claim of a constitutional violation because of the delay in scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gwendolyn Lawver v. Marshfield Clinic
Venture I's subrogation claim to those proceeds. We conclude that the trial court properly denied its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7777 - 2017-09-19
Venture I's subrogation claim to those proceeds. We conclude that the trial court properly denied its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7777 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the inaccuracies.[1] The circuit court denied the motion, concluding the claims for relief were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
the inaccuracies.[1] The circuit court denied the motion, concluding the claims for relief were barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
claimed that he had relapsed into heavy drinking again following his brother’s death. On rebuttal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
claimed that he had relapsed into heavy drinking again following his brother’s death. On rebuttal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of sentencing discretion Eminovski claims his sentences were harsh and unconscionable. A sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
of sentencing discretion Eminovski claims his sentences were harsh and unconscionable. A sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2007AP487 2 hearing. Parrett claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31113 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2005-06 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2007AP487 2 hearing. Parrett claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31113 - 2014-09-15