Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22231 - 22240 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 22231 - 22240 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02-2138). In each of the cases, the trial courts that accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31
. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02-2138). In each of the cases, the trial courts that accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31
William J. Evers v. John A. Hager
the judgment dismissing his claims against John Hager and Sherry Hager. Evers argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9687 - 2005-03-31
the judgment dismissing his claims against John Hager and Sherry Hager. Evers argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. Id. at 214 (directing that, if the State fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
trial. Id. at 214 (directing that, if the State fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
[PDF]
State v. Willie M. Kendricks
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2) his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5177 - 2017-09-19
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2) his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5177 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02- 2138). In each of the cases, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5545 - 2017-09-19
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02- 2138). In each of the cases, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5545 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02- 2138). In each of the cases, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02- 2138). In each of the cases, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal, Harper contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence during his jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718306 - 2023-10-24
. On appeal, Harper contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence during his jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718306 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
on August 19, 1999 …." His brief, however, addresses the trial court's denial on August 19 of Brandt's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
on August 19, 1999 …." His brief, however, addresses the trial court's denial on August 19 of Brandt's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William N. Osberg v. Stephen Kienitz
and Highway Landscapers, Inc. are not eligible for immunity, and therefore the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21695 - 2017-09-21
and Highway Landscapers, Inc. are not eligible for immunity, and therefore the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21695 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 42
Consultants, Ltd., and American Safety Risk Retention. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28012 - 2014-08-21
Consultants, Ltd., and American Safety Risk Retention. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28012 - 2014-08-21