Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22231 - 22240 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 22231 - 22240 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI APP 42
. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions responding to the motions for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28012 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions responding to the motions for summary judgment because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28012 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 42
Consultants, Ltd., and American Safety Risk Retention. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28012 - 2007-03-27
Consultants, Ltd., and American Safety Risk Retention. The trial court rejected the Hunters’ submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28012 - 2007-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
for a trial before the court commissioner on December 11, 2008. ¶3 On December 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53590 - 2010-08-23
for a trial before the court commissioner on December 11, 2008. ¶3 On December 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53590 - 2010-08-23
[PDF]
State v. Terrance J. Trammell
the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Trammell claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 Trammell claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21
Gregory T. Isermann v. Elizabeth A. Isermann
., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. Gregory T. Isermann appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6144 - 2005-03-31
., Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. Gregory T. Isermann appeals from a trial court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6144 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02-2138). In each of the cases, the trial courts that accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31
. § 943.20(1)(b) & (3)) (appeal number 02-2138). In each of the cases, the trial courts that accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for incest and for repeatedly sexually assaulting his niece
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760158 - 2024-02-07
of conviction, entered following a jury trial, for incest and for repeatedly sexually assaulting his niece
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760158 - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying their request for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
The Lucarelis argue that the trial court erred by denying their request for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13746 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We conclude the officer lawfully entered Nowak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2011-05-16
testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We conclude the officer lawfully entered Nowak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2011-05-16
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
proceeding was “fundamentally unfair,” and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12195 - 2005-03-31
proceeding was “fundamentally unfair,” and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12195 - 2005-03-31