Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22251 - 22260 of 38489 for t's.
Search results 22251 - 22260 of 38489 for t's.
State v. David J. Clark
for the second year spent by him in jail as a condition of probation. In its own words, “[t]he State recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
for the second year spent by him in jail as a condition of probation. In its own words, “[t]he State recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4443 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Dane County: david t. flanagan III, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Jennifer F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
court for Dane County: david t. flanagan III, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Jennifer F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65478 - 2011-06-08
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s determination that Mason was not competent to represent himself.[1] “[T]he trial judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106614 - 2014-01-13
court’s determination that Mason was not competent to represent himself.[1] “[T]he trial judge’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106614 - 2014-01-13
State v. Michael Morris
two prior misdemeanor convictions for battery, the court stated: “[I]t is more important that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13251 - 2013-12-19
two prior misdemeanor convictions for battery, the court stated: “[I]t is more important that you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13251 - 2013-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.” John insists that “[t]urning an excluded, individual asset into cash does not change the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32231 - 2008-03-24
.” John insists that “[t]urning an excluded, individual asset into cash does not change the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32231 - 2008-03-24
CA Blank Order
Bay, WI 54305-3600 Timothy T. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office P.O. Box 1625 Green Bay, WI 54305-1625
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
Bay, WI 54305-3600 Timothy T. O’Connell O’Connell Law Office P.O. Box 1625 Green Bay, WI 54305-1625
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111233 - 2014-04-28
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Brian C.
of judicial estoppel. The supreme court has held that “[i]t is contrary to fundamental principles of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4168 - 2005-03-31
of judicial estoppel. The supreme court has held that “[i]t is contrary to fundamental principles of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4168 - 2005-03-31
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
, but found: [T]he doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply here as there is no compulsory counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
, but found: [T]he doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply here as there is no compulsory counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
Nate A. Lindell v. Matthew Frank
of the circuit court for Dane County: David T. Flanagan III and Richard G. niess, Judges. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26482 - 2015-03-22
of the circuit court for Dane County: David T. Flanagan III and Richard G. niess, Judges. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26482 - 2015-03-22
State v. Ramaun A. Harris
” for drug dealers, and “[t]he violence associated with drug trafficking today places law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2881 - 2005-03-31
” for drug dealers, and “[t]he violence associated with drug trafficking today places law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2881 - 2005-03-31