Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22261 - 22270 of 68499 for did.

Louis J. Ferris v. Ex-Chancellor Judith L. Kuipers
violated the Wisconsin Open Meetings Law because they did not hold a public meeting before renaming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7040 - 2005-03-31

Roy G. Hoenecke v. Village of McFarland
identified the proposed date of occupancy as June 1, 1996, and the Village did, in fact, occupy the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16150 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick J. Lesage
, LeSage did not show that the evidence was relevant as substantive proof. LeSage never made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10973 - 2017-09-19

State v. Bruce Lee Brown
that the alleged change in parole policy did not amount to a new factor entitling Brown to resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18256 - 2005-05-23

State v. Daniel J. Balint
to be represented by counsel. He did receive initial representation from a public defender. However, the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8706 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bruce Lee Brown
in parole policy did not amount to a new factor entitling Brown to resentencing. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18256 - 2017-09-21

State v. Larry J.D. Spencer
We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. The court heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5912 - 2005-03-31

Steven A. Boetcher v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
the case and that he did not believe the plaintiffs should be compensated in any way.” The affidavit also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5990 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joshua O. Kyles
argues that police did have reasonable suspicion under McGill, while Kyles argues that they did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
did not show whether the doctor examined the devices. We reject GBP's arguments and affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10573 - 2017-09-20