Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22261 - 22270 of 46948 for show's.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of making “a prima facie showing that his plea was accepted without the trial court’s conformance with sec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28566 - 2007-03-26

[PDF] State v. Michael P. Stefko
the judgments of conviction showing Stefko's repeater status and he acknowledged his status as a repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10098 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 168 N.W.2d 843 (1969). Rather, the defendant must also show that the presence of those restraints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at the beginning of trial, Goodavage has not made an offer of proof showing what her son would have testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75593 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
successor counsel, however, was later allowed to show the videotape of that meeting to the jury and N.A
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16711 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
is not paid within the specified time and absent a showing to this court of his inability to pay restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33321 - 2008-07-07

CA Blank Order
on September 30, 2011. Surveillance photos evidently showing Green were also available from that robbery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97417 - 2013-05-23

COURT OF APPEALS
, before a circuit court may order a defendant to pay restitution, “there must be a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70213 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] State v. Darryl D. Johnson
in Strickland v. Washington, must be satisfied. A defendant “must show that counsel’s performance was both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11785 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Bernard A. James
a two-step process: the defendant must first show the existence of a new factor justifying the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4022 - 2017-09-20