Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 97620 for court records search online.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 97620 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47753 - 2010-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88087 - 2012-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts of record does not support the conclusion that the trial court reached, or (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38154 - 2009-07-22
of the facts of record does not support the conclusion that the trial court reached, or (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38154 - 2009-07-22
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68343 - 2011-07-25
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, then the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68343 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 16, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 16, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. No evidence in the record supports the court’s assumption that most jurors know the noncriminal nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
. No evidence in the record supports the court’s assumption that most jurors know the noncriminal nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record. The trial court stated it was most disturbed that Presberry perjured himself on the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
by the record. The trial court stated it was most disturbed that Presberry perjured himself on the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 9, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
to give the court the authority to decide if home schooling should continue is supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
to give the court the authority to decide if home schooling should continue is supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous. We conclude the record supports the court’s findings and the decision not to appoint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72894 - 2011-10-26
are clearly erroneous. We conclude the record supports the court’s findings and the decision not to appoint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72894 - 2011-10-26