Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50188 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
is a question of law that we review de novo. Wisconsin Pub. Serv. Corp. v. Andrews, 2009 WI App 30, ¶10, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43131 - 2009-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
construction arise, our review is de novo. See Wisconsin Dep’t of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66203 - 2011-06-20
construction arise, our review is de novo. See Wisconsin Dep’t of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66203 - 2011-06-20
2007 WI APP 144
). Where the facts are not in dispute, there remain only questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29220 - 2007-06-26
). Where the facts are not in dispute, there remain only questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29220 - 2007-06-26
2007 WI APP 240
whether the Waalen language clarifies the statutory term “materially impaired.” We employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
whether the Waalen language clarifies the statutory term “materially impaired.” We employ a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30631 - 2007-11-27
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua Slagoski
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postjudgment order. When we review legal issues, like the construction of a divorce judgment, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69171 - 2005-03-31
postjudgment order. When we review legal issues, like the construction of a divorce judgment, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69171 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tom Sweeney
Sweeney's counsel was making "all of the arguments available to him," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
Sweeney's counsel was making "all of the arguments available to him," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10