Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Gregory Spinner and Marianne Giannis v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment, Inc
review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21
review, our standard of review of the circuit court’s ruling is de novo. See Nielsen v. Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
face.” See ibid. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
face.” See ibid. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109418 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court judges and court websites
of Circuit Court Dodge De Vries, Hon. Martin J. Pfitzinger, Hon. Brian A. Snow, Hon. Kristine A. Wozniak, Hon
/courts/circuit/judges.htm - 2026-02-23
of Circuit Court Dodge De Vries, Hon. Martin J. Pfitzinger, Hon. Brian A. Snow, Hon. Kristine A. Wozniak, Hon
/courts/circuit/judges.htm - 2026-02-23
[PDF]
WI APP 108
of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32918 - 2014-09-15
of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32918 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 169
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29338 - 2014-09-15
prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29338 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). We review the court’s factual findings for clear error, but we determine de novo whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569434 - 2022-09-22
). We review the court’s factual findings for clear error, but we determine de novo whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569434 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
Jill K. Niese v. Skip Barber Racing School, Inc.
judgment applying the same methodology as the trial court and we consider the issues de novo. Werdehoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3741 - 2017-09-19
judgment applying the same methodology as the trial court and we consider the issues de novo. Werdehoff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3741 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the MSA, we review that issue de novo. See Winters v. Winters, 2005 WI App 94, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 798
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
of the MSA, we review that issue de novo. See Winters v. Winters, 2005 WI App 94, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 798
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Neung S.
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2205 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or prejudice prong is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id. A. DIRECTED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2205 - 2005-03-31
Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
an issue of law that we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2013-12-18
an issue of law that we decide de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15822 - 2013-12-18