Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22271 - 22280 of 68942 for had.

State v. Thomas F. Fetzner
informant. Id. at 271. In J.L, all the police had to go on was the bare report of an unknown tipster who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3806 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
., the court had the jury returned to the courtroom, and the court asked the foreperson: “And is it your
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31007 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy because he had already been convicted for that stalking conduct. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143517 - 2015-06-30

Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
. Gerard was to pick up the children for a visit on September 26. Three days earlier, Gerard had sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10281 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
of the price Loehrke had estimated the job would cost. Loehrke subsequently sent Praxmarer a bill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the read-in charge when he executed the plea questionnaire. Jackson also claims his trial counsel “had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218909 - 2018-09-11

COURT OF APPEALS
(including cracks, seepage and bulges).” The Gaszaks had lived in the home eleven years. The Gaszaks had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57400 - 2010-12-07

[PDF] City of Watertown v. Brent A. Genz
of the Watertown Police Department was the only witness. He had been employed as a police officer by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14963 - 2017-09-21

Charles Gray Beverage Company, Inc. v. Utica Mutual Insurance Company
to procure the same business interruption insurance coverage for the Charles Gray Beverage Company as it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10410 - 2005-03-31

Tracy Berginz-Graef v. Stephanie E. Lamon
testimony that she had suffered a herniated disc would not have violated the pretrial order excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11481 - 2005-03-31