Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22281 - 22290 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 22281 - 22290 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was unconstitutional, and “an order vacating the judgment entered [in the 2013 tax foreclosure case].” The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216067 - 2018-07-24
was unconstitutional, and “an order vacating the judgment entered [in the 2013 tax foreclosure case].” The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216067 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 20-09 - Comments from Wisconsin Victim Witness Professionals
process, to be informed, to have a voice and to have their time respected. In some cases
/supreme/docs/2009commentswivictpro.pdf - 2021-03-02
process, to be informed, to have a voice and to have their time respected. In some cases
/supreme/docs/2009commentswivictpro.pdf - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Forever Wisconsin
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 23AP1399 Rebecca Clarke
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224amicusbriefforever.pdf - 2024-01-24
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 23AP1399 Rebecca Clarke
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012224amicusbriefforever.pdf - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Larry W. Norris
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2158 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11171 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2158 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11171 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in a Chapter 980 commitment case. We affirm the order for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
in a Chapter 980 commitment case. We affirm the order for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and pursuant to the policy underlying WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(4), we refer to the victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11
and pursuant to the policy underlying WIS. STAT. RULE 809.86(4), we refer to the victim in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
John D. Puchner v. Anne C. Hepperla
2001 WI App 50 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14580 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI App 50 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14580 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher V. Teague
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case is whether drug evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case is whether drug evidence obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4594 - 2005-03-31
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
, the cases were scheduled for a jury trial on January 8, 2001. Prior to the jury trial, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher V. Teague
a judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19
a judgment of conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The only issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19