Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 69102 for as he.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 69102 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109998 - 2014-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
driving while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues: (1) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85843 - 2012-08-06
driving while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues: (1) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85843 - 2012-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Byron A. Anderson
offense. He argues that he was effectively under arrest when the arresting officer told him he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
offense. He argues that he was effectively under arrest when the arresting officer told him he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21578 - 2017-09-21
State v. Barry M. Jenkins
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
withdrawal, which he made prior to sentencing; (2) a manifest injustice exists that warrants plea withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21578 - 2006-02-23
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
wanted to sell the property. When the realtor, Yoder, returned from vacation on September 12, he found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
wanted to sell the property. When the realtor, Yoder, returned from vacation on September 12, he found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10543 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wilfredo Melo
of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession with intent to deliver cocaine. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
of conviction, following his guilty plea, for possession with intent to deliver cocaine. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Glenn R. Reetz
of his motion to suppress all evidence relating to his arrest, which he claimed was illegal.3 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11106 - 2017-09-19
of his motion to suppress all evidence relating to his arrest, which he claimed was illegal.3 He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11106 - 2017-09-19