Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91540 - 2013-01-14
that appellate courts review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91540 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Green
. . ., except . . . a proceeding before a court commissioner that may be reviewed de novo; . . . [s]ettlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14952 - 2017-09-21
. . ., except . . . a proceeding before a court commissioner that may be reviewed de novo; . . . [s]ettlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30068 - 2014-09-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Martha S. Steil v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
interpretation of a statute, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3003 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of a statute, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3003 - 2017-09-19
Michael J. M. v. Sheila M. S.
the circuit court’s May 2000 child support order. That is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3838 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s May 2000 child support order. That is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6535 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6535 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Olson v. Auto Sport, Inc.
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4544 - 2017-09-20
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4544 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or order. ¶7 Following the commissioner’s decision, Przytarski asked for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
or order. ¶7 Following the commissioner’s decision, Przytarski asked for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Sherry L. Anderson
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31