Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
Martha S. Steil v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
interpretation of a statute, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3003 - 2017-09-19
interpretation of a statute, there are three possible levels of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3003 - 2017-09-19
Michael J. M. v. Sheila M. S.
the circuit court’s May 2000 child support order. That is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3838 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court’s May 2000 child support order. That is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3838 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review the application of those facts to the law de novo. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21
, we review the application of those facts to the law de novo. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ronald W. Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6535 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we apply the same standards as did the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6535 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Olson v. Auto Sport, Inc.
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4544 - 2017-09-20
. WIS. STAT. § 802.08(2). A summary judgment motion presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4544 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or order. ¶7 Following the commissioner’s decision, Przytarski asked for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
or order. ¶7 Following the commissioner’s decision, Przytarski asked for a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46257 - 2010-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
2007 WI APP 120
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Sherry L. Anderson
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Zignego Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19