Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 29713 for des.
Martha S. Steil v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo. Zip Sort, Inc. v. DOR, 2001 WI App 185, ¶11-¶14, __ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3003 - 2005-03-31
of deference: great weight, due weight, or de novo. Zip Sort, Inc. v. DOR, 2001 WI App 185, ¶11-¶14, __ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Zignego Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law for de novo review. Id. A. Circuit Court’s Factual Finding That NDC Rejected The $90,500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156433 - 2017-09-21
of law for de novo review. Id. A. Circuit Court’s Factual Finding That NDC Rejected The $90,500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156433 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Slinker
present questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶18. ¶6 A presumption of vindictiveness arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6679 - 2017-09-20
present questions of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶18. ¶6 A presumption of vindictiveness arises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6679 - 2017-09-20
State v. Willy J. Love
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, prejudicial, are questions of law, however, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49565 - 2010-05-03
, prejudicial, are questions of law, however, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49565 - 2010-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of Navigators. ¶9 Mantz appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review an order for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49926 - 2010-05-11
of Navigators. ¶9 Mantz appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review an order for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49926 - 2010-05-11
[PDF]
Kathy Hoffman v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
decision de novo because this case is clearly one of first impression for WERC and WERC has no special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2621 - 2017-09-19
decision de novo because this case is clearly one of first impression for WERC and WERC has no special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2621 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Wild Goose Inn, Inc.
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis.2d 255, 258, 465 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7909 - 2017-09-19
of a contract is a question of law that we review de novo. Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis.2d 255, 258, 465 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7909 - 2017-09-19