Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 68466 for did.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer Vian
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10575 - 2017-09-20
of Jennifer Vian and what she said she did and did not do to the children.” Counsel did not object to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10575 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did not result in intercourse,” to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
County of Portage v. Boyd A. Trachsel
and was improperly denied, an alternative chemical test. The circuit court found that Trachsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15438 - 2017-09-21
and was improperly denied, an alternative chemical test. The circuit court found that Trachsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Collins
controversy was not tried because trial counsel did not object to certain testimony of the victim’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
controversy was not tried because trial counsel did not object to certain testimony of the victim’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4439 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
Harris with the diary entries. Larkowski testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
Harris with the diary entries. Larkowski testified that she stated to Harris, “Thank goodness this did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27091 - 2014-09-15
State v. John R. Calkins
he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
on behalf of a client. Thereafter, he did not comply with the terms of the court’s pretrial order setting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
on behalf of a client. Thereafter, he did not comply with the terms of the court’s pretrial order setting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas R. Pedersen
). Pedersen does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7931 - 2005-03-31
). Pedersen does not dispute the sufficiency of the evidence. However, he claims that the State did not prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not assault Sylindria when the petition alleged he did. His counsel asserted, “[The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51490 - 2014-09-15
did not assault Sylindria when the petition alleged he did. His counsel asserted, “[The petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51490 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
court that the Simonoviches did not establish fraud for purposes of § 806.07(1)(c) relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117322 - 2014-07-22
court that the Simonoviches did not establish fraud for purposes of § 806.07(1)(c) relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117322 - 2014-07-22