Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2231 - 2240 of 18668 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a particular case.’” Id., ¶22 (quoted source omitted). In the context of a traffic stop, “such a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27

[PDF] Carol M. Oberbreckling v. Waterford Square Apartments
to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case’”) (quoted source omitted); Selerski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16339 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
wrist and ankle.” This assertion was a direct quote from the presentence investigation report (PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107984 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
at 578, 685 N.W.2d at 617 (quoting Marek, 473 U.S. at 9). No. 2005AP935 4 ¶5 As we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24877 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frederick F.
(quoted source omitted). This court will substitute its judgment for that of the trial court only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15250 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 348, 362 n.5, 577 N.W.2d 13 (1998) (quoted source omitted). Rather, it is that neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98324 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Chandler D. Hall
. Dawson, 195 Wis.2d 161, 172, 536 N.W.2d 119, 123 (Ct. App. 1995) (quoted source omitted). Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10841 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a brief stop.” Id. (quoting State v. Anderson, 155 Wis. 2d 77, 84, 454 N.W.2d 763 (1990)). As our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196505 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Dwight Gustafson
N.W.2d 802 (1995) (quoting Michigan v. DeFillippo, 443 U.S. 31, 37 (1979)); see also WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2152 - 2017-09-19

C & B Investments v. Wisconsin Winnebago Health Department
(quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976) (quoting United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7705 - 2005-03-31