Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
for Waukesha County: Linda M. van de water, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Jon Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72163 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01
Brenda Murphy v. Bruce C. Nordhagen
6, 1993. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31
6, 1993. We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13673 - 2005-03-31
Jane Fulton v. Raymond R. Vogt
. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 289, 507 N.W.2d 136, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11090 - 2005-03-31
. Hunzinger Constr. Co., 179 Wis.2d 281, 289, 507 N.W.2d 136, 139 (Ct. App. 1993). Our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11090 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15124 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
. The standard of review of a question concerning the interpretation of a statue is de novo. See State v. Irish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
Patients Compensation Fund v. Lutheran Hospital-LaCrosse, Inc.
. This case presents questions of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Wisconsin Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10815 - 2005-03-31
. This case presents questions of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Wisconsin Patients
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10815 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint sets forth probable cause to justify a criminal charge is a legal determination we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32607 - 2008-05-06
complaint sets forth probable cause to justify a criminal charge is a legal determination we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32607 - 2008-05-06
Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-05-19
review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-05-19