Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency and prejudice. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 84
of the case law. This presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84153 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Breianne S. Johnson v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
are raised, which we review de novo. Silingo v. Village of Mukwonago, 156 Wis.2d 536, 539, 458 N.W.2d 379
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10790 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Conrad J. Korbisch
or prejudice is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 128. ¶26 Korbisch has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2838 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
they are found to be clearly erroneous, and we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297860 - 2020-12-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard for recommitment, however, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301821 - 2020-11-04

[PDF] NOS Communications, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
the extent of the agency’s jurisdiction and powers, which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5514 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77359 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Alexander, 2013 WI 70, ¶18, 349 Wis. 2d 327, 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224562 - 2018-10-30

[PDF] WI APP 96
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15