Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 29823 for des.

State v. Milton A. Bumpers
a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571 N.W.2d 417
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3707 - 2012-09-24

State v. Chad Everts
question involving double jeopardy. As such, Everts contends that we should make a de novo finding of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3758 - 2005-03-31

Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Patricia H.
of a statute presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4623 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Maria-Lucia A. Cardoso, a/k/a M.-Lucia de A. Cardoso, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130922 - 2005-03-31

Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. Factual findings made by the circuit court shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15472 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lana Lanser
of law de novo. See State v. Wilson, 170 Wis.2d 720, 722, 490 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Ct. App. 1992). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
purposes is a question of law, which must be decided by this court de novo. Forbes contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120484 - 2014-08-27

Shane M. Heimerl v. Waverly Beach, Inc.
We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United States Fid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6320 - 2005-03-31

State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of a divorce judgment, appellate courts apply a de novo standard of review.... We construe divorce judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07