Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 70138 for his.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 70138 for his.
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
Judith Clemence v. Maryland Casualty Company
Judith Clemence and her husband, David, appeal the dismissal of Grundy and his insurer.[2] The Clemences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2821 - 2005-03-31
Judith Clemence and her husband, David, appeal the dismissal of Grundy and his insurer.[2] The Clemences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2821 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of the same child. Hicks argues recorded telephone statements he made to his victim were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
assault of the same child. Hicks argues recorded telephone statements he made to his victim were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
Edmund J. Krawcyzk v. Bank of Sun Prairie
William Livingston and his insurer. A.G. Edwards & Sons, a third-party defendant, appeals from the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9037 - 2005-03-31
William Livingston and his insurer. A.G. Edwards & Sons, a third-party defendant, appeals from the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9037 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 72
, including putting her mouth on his penis and his penis in her vagina. She denied that he put his mouth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32503 - 2014-09-15
, including putting her mouth on his penis and his penis in her vagina. She denied that he put his mouth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 2
as a repeater. He contends his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated when the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater. He contends his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated when the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kevin E. Daugherty
-CR 2 of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Daughtery contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25256 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Daughtery contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for repeated sexual assault of the same child. Hicks argues recorded telephone statements he made to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
for repeated sexual assault of the same child. Hicks argues recorded telephone statements he made to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas L. Seeley
and Roggensack, JJ. ROGGENSACK, J. Thomas Seeley appeals his conviction for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31
and Roggensack, JJ. ROGGENSACK, J. Thomas Seeley appeals his conviction for first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11076 - 2005-03-31
State v. Oscar Anderson, Jr.
. Alternatively, Anderson argues that the trial court should have suppressed his statement because it was coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11740 - 2005-03-31
. Alternatively, Anderson argues that the trial court should have suppressed his statement because it was coerced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11740 - 2005-03-31