Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 22301 - 22310 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the complaint; failure to file a notice of claim under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1);[2] discretionary act immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57151 - 2010-11-29
of the complaint; failure to file a notice of claim under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(1);[2] discretionary act immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57151 - 2010-11-29
COURT OF APPEALS
and that he presented newly discovered evidence postconviction. We reject these claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
and that he presented newly discovered evidence postconviction. We reject these claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
State v. Perry E. Hagler
the pictures upon learning that E.F. was a minor.[1] Hagler claims this is when he first learned that E.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11129 - 2007-05-31
the pictures upon learning that E.F. was a minor.[1] Hagler claims this is when he first learned that E.F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11129 - 2007-05-31
Bernard R. Lyon v. Renee G. Hilgers
for the value of income tax exemptions claimed by Hilgers. We reject Lyon’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16263 - 2005-03-31
for the value of income tax exemptions claimed by Hilgers. We reject Lyon’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16263 - 2005-03-31
Ekatrina Pratchenko v. Donald Fuller
the intentional acts exclusion; the plaintiffs' claims for damages were not caused by an accident and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11198 - 2005-03-31
the intentional acts exclusion; the plaintiffs' claims for damages were not caused by an accident and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. §§ 809.30 and 974.02 (2017-18)1 seeking a new trial. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. §§ 809.30 and 974.02 (2017-18)1 seeking a new trial. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289121 - 2020-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Provocation may prevent someone from claiming the privilege of self-defense. See Wis. Stat. § 939.48(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53250 - 2010-08-16
. Provocation may prevent someone from claiming the privilege of self-defense. See Wis. Stat. § 939.48(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53250 - 2010-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
). This court held that the circuit court properly denied Montgomery’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
). This court held that the circuit court properly denied Montgomery’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24
[PDF]
George M. DeBruin v. Town of Ashippun Board of Review
—for 1994. He objected to the assessment, claiming that it discriminated against residential property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20
—for 1994. He objected to the assessment, claiming that it discriminated against residential property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11776 - 2017-09-20
State v. Domingo Ramirez
Ramirez. Ramirez contested the intercept, claiming no reasonable suspicion. The trial court threw out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2278 - 2005-03-31
Ramirez. Ramirez contested the intercept, claiming no reasonable suspicion. The trial court threw out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2278 - 2005-03-31