Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22311 - 22320 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 22311 - 22320 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A week before his scheduled trial, the prosecutor made an offer to O’Neill in a letter. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
. A week before his scheduled trial, the prosecutor made an offer to O’Neill in a letter. The letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Liduvina Stensland appeals from the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3485 - 2017-09-20
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Liduvina Stensland appeals from the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3485 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was convicted in 2009 of first degree sexual assault of a child, following a jury trial. In 2011, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756608 - 2024-02-01
was convicted in 2009 of first degree sexual assault of a child, following a jury trial. In 2011, this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756608 - 2024-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
called 911. ¶3 Shortly before trial, Sparks moved to adjourn so that he could retain an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
called 911. ¶3 Shortly before trial, Sparks moved to adjourn so that he could retain an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51473 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
relief. He contends that the trial court allowed No. 2007AP1905-CR 2 inadmissible expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33270 - 2014-09-15
relief. He contends that the trial court allowed No. 2007AP1905-CR 2 inadmissible expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33270 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brandon J. N.
2 (3)(a). Brandon argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4222 - 2017-09-19
2 (3)(a). Brandon argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4222 - 2017-09-19
State v. Karen A.O.
that Karen should not be bound by her failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9931 - 2005-03-31
that Karen should not be bound by her failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9931 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karen A.O.
that Karen should not be bound by her failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9932 - 2005-03-31
that Karen should not be bound by her failure to raise the issue in the trial court, we reverse the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9932 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights. Amanda argues the trial court lost competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31511 - 2014-09-15
. appeals orders terminating her parental rights. Amanda argues the trial court lost competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31511 - 2014-09-15
State v. Latasha J.
seeking to vacate the default entered against her. Latasha claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31
seeking to vacate the default entered against her. Latasha claims that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6058 - 2005-03-31