Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22331 - 22340 of 30242 for de.
Search results 22331 - 22340 of 30242 for de.
Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
summary judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2011-12-12
summary judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14199 - 2011-12-12
State v. Robert K.
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7670 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 108
and the application of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32918 - 2008-07-29
and the application of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32918 - 2008-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32281 - 2008-03-31
principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32281 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2016AP800 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189392 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2016AP800 5 DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189392 - 2017-09-21
James A. Holzbauer v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.
of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20014 - 2005-12-11
of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20014 - 2005-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93318 - 2013-02-25
judgment decisions de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Smith v. Dodgeville Mut. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93318 - 2013-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32463 - 2011-04-28
of law, which we review de novo. See Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 225, 594 N.W.2d 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32463 - 2011-04-28
[PDF]
Susan M. Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
a question of law that we review de novo. See Ottinger, 215 Wis. 2d at 273. When reviewing a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2187 - 2017-09-19
a question of law that we review de novo. See Ottinger, 215 Wis. 2d at 273. When reviewing a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2187 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Hayes
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4784 - 2017-09-19