Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22331 - 22340 of 68326 for did.
Search results 22331 - 22340 of 68326 for did.
[PDF]
State v. James Ware
sentence modification. The trial court denied the motion as untimely and did not address the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7147 - 2017-09-20
sentence modification. The trial court denied the motion as untimely and did not address the merits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7147 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Wayne K. Elworth
retained possession of moveable property of another; (2) the owner of the property did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7357 - 2017-09-20
retained possession of moveable property of another; (2) the owner of the property did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7357 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Randy C. Minder v. Nathan A. DeGross
found that DeGross did not negligently operate his vehicle at the time of the accident. Minder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15908 - 2017-09-21
found that DeGross did not negligently operate his vehicle at the time of the accident. Minder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15908 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not knowingly waive his right to counsel and that the circuit court erred in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
did not knowingly waive his right to counsel and that the circuit court erred in sentencing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
because they did not move for reconsideration in the six-month period between the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37596 - 2014-09-15
because they did not move for reconsideration in the six-month period between the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37596 - 2014-09-15
Karl McNeil v. Brandon Hansen
compensation statute. The trial court concluded that the facts and circumstances presented in this case did
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24810 - 2006-04-17
compensation statute. The trial court concluded that the facts and circumstances presented in this case did
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24810 - 2006-04-17
COURT OF APPEALS
p.m. to 1:30 a.m., but, she testified, she did not feel drunk. She also contradicted some details
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
p.m. to 1:30 a.m., but, she testified, she did not feel drunk. She also contradicted some details
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
State v. Ryan C.C.
to him. Ryan said he did not know where Misty was, but that he had spoken with her on the telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2423 - 2005-03-31
to him. Ryan said he did not know where Misty was, but that he had spoken with her on the telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2423 - 2005-03-31
State v. Juergen Huebner
damage to property, see § 943.01(1), Stats. He was convicted by a six-person jury, to which he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31
damage to property, see § 943.01(1), Stats. He was convicted by a six-person jury, to which he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
discretion. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18775 - 2005-07-05
discretion. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18775 - 2005-07-05