Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22341 - 22350 of 30242 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those facts require suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174915 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeremy R. Engebretson
Wis. 2d 714, 605 N.W.2d 836. Finally, we construe a deferred prosecution agreement de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4687 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kerby G. Denman
of the relationship between WIS. STAT. § 980.05(1m) and (2) presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15747 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Cathy Wallace v. Adult Family Care Homes
to the applicable law de novo as a question of law. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13062 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas B. Brulport
. Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Mattes, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9228 - 2007-09-13

Allan J. Payleitner v. Timothy I. Mac Gillis
the trial court’s conclusion of law de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16132 - 2005-03-31

State v. Angelo J. Ewing
the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4196 - 2005-03-31

Robert V. LaCombe v. Aurora Medical Group, Inc.
of law) (superceded by Wis. Stat. § 895.52 on other grounds), which the court decides de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6743 - 2005-03-31

Todd Stendahl v. A & M Insulation Co.
, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15040 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review de novo the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-17