Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 69135 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charges and the kidnapping charge. His defense was that he and D.S. had consensual sexual intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
charges and the kidnapping charge. His defense was that he and D.S. had consensual sexual intercourse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
Frederick N. Spence v. John Husz
that he participate in an alcohol and other drug abuse (AODA) program that conflicted with scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15462 - 2005-03-31
that he participate in an alcohol and other drug abuse (AODA) program that conflicted with scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a contempt order that was entered after he failed to bring property he leased into compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
a contempt order that was entered after he failed to bring property he leased into compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737200 - 2023-12-06
State v. April Dakins
was a probation search, that the probationer had common authority over the premises that he shared with Dakins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
was a probation search, that the probationer had common authority over the premises that he shared with Dakins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
driver’s license because he refused to take a § 343.305(3)(a), Stats.,[1] chemical test.[2] The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
driver’s license because he refused to take a § 343.305(3)(a), Stats.,[1] chemical test.[2] The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He also objects to the ruling by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
that his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. He also objects to the ruling by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
Christine Magnuson Stanfield v. Paul E. Magnuson
at that time. He moved to reduce his support obligation in 1996, after he was incarcerated. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7373 - 2005-03-31
at that time. He moved to reduce his support obligation in 1996, after he was incarcerated. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7373 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward C. Brandau
his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He argues that due to ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He argues that due to ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Mitchell D. Butschle appeals from the judgment entered after he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
. ¶1 GROGAN, J.1 Mitchell D. Butschle appeals from the judgment entered after he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798443 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
Gregory L. Schulz v. Time Insurance Company
and did so within a reasonable time.” Schulz further concedes that he “did not financially impair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8148 - 2017-09-19
and did so within a reasonable time.” Schulz further concedes that he “did not financially impair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8148 - 2017-09-19