Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 29823 for des.

State v. Phonesavanh Vanmanivong
de novo, "benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court of appeals." State v. Head
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16449 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Grant County Department of Social Services v. Unified Board of Grant and Iowa Counties
N.W.2d 72 (reversing an order of the circuit court of Grant County, Robert P. Van De Hey, Judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18922 - 2017-09-21

Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins
de novo to determine whether, as a matter of first impression, viewing the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7686 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 35
of discretion, we analyze de novo whether a trial court’s exclusion of evidence deprived a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539546 - 2022-10-11

[PDF] WI App 47
argument regarding the modification provision. ¶14 In addressing each issue, we use a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544195 - 2022-11-08

[PDF] Thomas G. Schanke v. Mitchell Street State Bank
of the circuit court de novo. See First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16518 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Chrysler Outboard Corporation
exercise a de novo standard of review. Thus, we analyze and apply the law without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17107 - 2017-09-21

State v. Chrysler Outboard Corporation
for summary judgment, we exercise a de novo standard of review. Thus, we analyze and apply the law without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17107 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pleads a cause of action is a question of law that we review de novo. Hermann v. Town of Delavan, 215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024679 - 2025-11-10

COURT OF APPEALS
facts constitute prejudicially deficient performance is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102038 - 2013-09-17