Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 57351 for id.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a court need not address the other. Id. at 697. “To prove constitutional deficiency, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213013 - 2018-05-22
, a court need not address the other. Id. at 697. “To prove constitutional deficiency, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213013 - 2018-05-22
State v. John R. Maloney
a sufficient showing on one of them. Id. ¶8 Whether counsel was ineffective presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6769 - 2005-03-31
a sufficient showing on one of them. Id. ¶8 Whether counsel was ineffective presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6769 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevon D. Davidson
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6595 - 2005-03-31
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To prove prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6595 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 190
. Id. If the statutory requirements are satisfied, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26048 - 2014-09-15
. Id. If the statutory requirements are satisfied, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26048 - 2014-09-15
State v. John Allen
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a “strong presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5695 - 2005-03-31
the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690. There is a “strong presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5695 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143684 - 2015-06-29
was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143684 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must overcome a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57316 - 2010-12-01
representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must overcome a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57316 - 2010-12-01
[PDF]
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
all the circumstances. Id. at 688. A defendant must overcome the presumption that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
all the circumstances. Id. at 688. A defendant must overcome the presumption that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8058 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
of will or trust construction is to determine the intent of the testator or settlor. Id. at 215, 538 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21
of will or trust construction is to determine the intent of the testator or settlor. Id. at 215, 538 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Tyler
. Id. at 697. ¶10 To prove prejudice, Tyler must demonstrate that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5702 - 2017-09-19
. Id. at 697. ¶10 To prove prejudice, Tyler must demonstrate that “there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5702 - 2017-09-19