Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 57581 for id.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 57581 for id.
State v. Ontario D. Lowery
the ruling if there is a reasonable basis for it. Id. ¶13 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4432 - 2005-03-31
the ruling if there is a reasonable basis for it. Id. ¶13 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4432 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy A. Schill
effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Id. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Id. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
if his representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57316 - 2014-09-15
if his representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Harris D. Byers
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To show prejudice, the defendant must demonstrate that the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87143 - 2014-09-15
competent assistance.” Id. at 690. To show prejudice, the defendant must demonstrate that the result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87143 - 2014-09-15
State v. William Speener
appeal.’” Id. (quoted source omitted). Procedurally, a § 974.06 motion follows a motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31
appeal.’” Id. (quoted source omitted). Procedurally, a § 974.06 motion follows a motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31
State v. Pablo Martin Rios
(1967). Consent is one of the recognized exceptions. Id. at 358 n.22. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5590 - 2005-03-31
(1967). Consent is one of the recognized exceptions. Id. at 358 n.22. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the legislature. Id. When the legislature’s intent is clear from the language of the statute, we simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109461 - 2017-09-21
of the legislature. Id. When the legislature’s intent is clear from the language of the statute, we simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109461 - 2017-09-21