Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 49907 for our.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 49907 for our.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
courts by our state constitution, and not by acts of the legislature. Miller Brewing Co. v. LIRC, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6213 - 2013-12-12
courts by our state constitution, and not by acts of the legislature. Miller Brewing Co. v. LIRC, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6213 - 2013-12-12
Robert Garel v. Kenneth Morgan
) as referring to an abusive litigation offense. We disagree. ¶15 When we construe a statute, our primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31
) as referring to an abusive litigation offense. We disagree. ¶15 When we construe a statute, our primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15672 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
does not undermine our confidence in the jury’s conclusions. 2. Officer Testimony of Other Sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2010-02-10
does not undermine our confidence in the jury’s conclusions. 2. Officer Testimony of Other Sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2010-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). Our standard of review is “‘highly deferential.’” See State v. Shomberg, 2006 WI 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116820 - 2014-07-14
(citation omitted). Our standard of review is “‘highly deferential.’” See State v. Shomberg, 2006 WI 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116820 - 2014-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
deference to the circuit court. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
deference to the circuit court. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a discovery violation, our supreme court has stated that an error is harmless if “the State’s nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397249 - 2021-07-27
of a discovery violation, our supreme court has stated that an error is harmless if “the State’s nondisclosure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397249 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Based upon our review of No. 2019AP365-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251035 - 2019-12-04
Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Based upon our review of No. 2019AP365-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251035 - 2019-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP760-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2016AP760-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191642 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
postconviction motion for resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.07(7)(a) that, if met, require a court to order testing. Relevant to our decision here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581615 - 2022-10-26
. STAT. § 974.07(7)(a) that, if met, require a court to order testing. Relevant to our decision here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581615 - 2022-10-26