Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 83431 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea by threatening to withdraw from the case if Basley did not enter a plea and telling Basley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35068 - 2008-12-29
the plea by threatening to withdraw from the case if Basley did not enter a plea and telling Basley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35068 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
modification in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case nos. 00CF1393 and 00CF1760. In 00CF1393, Brown pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27436 - 2014-09-15
modification in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case nos. 00CF1393 and 00CF1760. In 00CF1393, Brown pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27436 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw from the case if Basley did not enter a plea and telling Basley that it might take up to a year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35068 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw from the case if Basley did not enter a plea and telling Basley that it might take up to a year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
not receive ineffective assistance of counsel, we affirm. ¶2 These consolidated cases have a rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
not receive ineffective assistance of counsel, we affirm. ¶2 These consolidated cases have a rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
Lindsay Mosher v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
that Dvorak would testify for the defense. However, after the Moshers had closed their case-in-chief, defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31
that Dvorak would testify for the defense. However, after the Moshers had closed their case-in-chief, defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence imposed in this case alleging that the sentence had not been adequately explained as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71076 - 2014-09-15
the sentence imposed in this case alleging that the sentence had not been adequately explained as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71076 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Edward S.
2001 WI App 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-1003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2024AP2554 2 conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050883 - 2025-12-18
2024AP2554 2 conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050883 - 2025-12-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
sufficient evidence of venue, and therefore he was entitled to dismissal at the close of the City’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470200 - 2022-01-12
summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470200 - 2022-01-12