Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22351 - 22360 of 58546 for speedy trial.

State v. David L. Fries
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), § 346.63(1)(a), Stats. He claims the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
investigation report (PSI) on which the trial court relied was biased. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Graebner Enterprises, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company of Wisconsin
raises several issues relating to insurance coverage and several issues arising out of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7820 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 The facts are taken from affidavits and trial testimony. The west border of the Schaefers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115237 - 2014-06-24

[PDF] State v. James L. Neeley
in violation of § 346.63(2)(a)2. The State argues that the trial court erred in excluding the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Sujan Singh Chada v. First Specialty Insurance Corporation
Specialty) for lack of personal No. 97-2247 2 jurisdiction. Chada claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12835 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and who has attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.” At trial, T.H. testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181948 - 2017-09-21

William Engelhart v. June C. Engelhart
ex-husband.[1] The trial court ruled that the petition was barred by the rules of claim preclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13404 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
jury during his initial commitment trial. 3 Although this appeal is solely concerned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656419 - 2023-05-16

[PDF] State v. Gary D. Kluczynski
offense. Kluczynski argues that he was denied a fair trial because of judicial bias. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26066 - 2017-09-21