Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22371 - 22380 of 29713 for des.

James A. Finch v. Southside Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
, a question of law that we decide de novo. See Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade (Beloit II), 2004 WI 39, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5717 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos R. Delgado
, their omission in light of this record was de minimis—they were only marginally relevant to proof of “manifest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11190 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court properly ordered mandamus relief based on the facts of record is reviewed de novo,” citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶26. ¶12 In July 2015, Karas’ counsel wrote to the Vilas County District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011113 - 2025-09-16

[PDF] Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
Statutory interpretation is an issue of law which we review de novo. While the review is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20196 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 207
. The interpretation of an insurance certificate is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State Farm Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26382 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.6 American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. American Girl, Inc., 2004 WI 2, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96548 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Hughes, 197 Wis. 2d at 978-79 (interpreting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37890 - 2009-07-16

[PDF] Ricki A. Ritt v. Dental Care Associates
of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 438, 468 N.W.2d at 22. In Clark
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8404 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the extent of the Board’s authority under the statutory scheme de novo. Osterhues v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139848 - 2017-09-21