Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22381 - 22390 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 22381 - 22390 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
of a child. He argues that the trial court erred in admitting a videotaped statement by the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44495 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court allowed inadmissible expert testimony at his trial, and that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33270 - 2008-07-02
that the trial court allowed inadmissible expert testimony at his trial, and that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33270 - 2008-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance from counsel. He also alleged that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
assistance from counsel. He also alleged that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
[PDF]
Other Disposition Summary
Categories Total Opened Total Reopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trial/JudicialDisposition
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/otherjuvdisposumstate24.pdf - 2025-03-06
Categories Total Opened Total Reopened Total Disposed Jury Trials Court Trial/JudicialDisposition
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/otherjuvdisposumstate24.pdf - 2025-03-06
State v. Jerry J. Meeks
attorney’s testimony, which, Meeks maintains, divulged privileged communications; (2) in evaluating his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3556 - 2005-03-31
attorney’s testimony, which, Meeks maintains, divulged privileged communications; (2) in evaluating his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerry J. Meeks
) in evaluating his trial attorney’s opinion of his competence; and (3) in considering the evidence in several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3556 - 2017-09-19
) in evaluating his trial attorney’s opinion of his competence; and (3) in considering the evidence in several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3556 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the scope of jeopardy in the first prosecution based upon trial testimony, as well as to determine who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255678 - 2020-03-05
the scope of jeopardy in the first prosecution based upon trial testimony, as well as to determine who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255678 - 2020-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Adrienne Luber
-final order that denied her motion to dismiss a second trial on a charge of driving with a prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
-final order that denied her motion to dismiss a second trial on a charge of driving with a prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Karl C. Williams v. Northern Technical Services, Inc.
and unreasonable, and thus unenforceable. NTS argues on appeal that the trial court erred in applying § 103.465
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9803 - 2017-09-19
and unreasonable, and thus unenforceable. NTS argues on appeal that the trial court erred in applying § 103.465
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9803 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 Stewart’s trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189951 - 2017-09-21
2 Stewart’s trial counsel was ineffective; (3) the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189951 - 2017-09-21