Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 82354 for simple case.
Search results 22391 - 22400 of 82354 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw from the case. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that Jones had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
to withdraw from the case. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that Jones had not established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the case as a whole, multiplying those hours by an hourly rate of $250.00, and adding in other expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
on the case as a whole, multiplying those hours by an hourly rate of $250.00, and adding in other expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
that there is insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of presumed or actual prosecutorial vindictiveness in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19
that there is insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of presumed or actual prosecutorial vindictiveness in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2731 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James Randall
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stated that it was “very, very clear to the [c]ourt in this case that there was no ill motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11
stated that it was “very, very clear to the [c]ourt in this case that there was no ill motive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887952 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Lauri Mohr
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9490 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9490 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this confidential matter using pseudonyms, rather than their initials. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
in this confidential matter using pseudonyms, rather than their initials. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
exculpatory or impeachment evidence relevant to this case. Inasmuch as Anderson would be entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
exculpatory or impeachment evidence relevant to this case. Inasmuch as Anderson would be entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36378 - 2009-05-04
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jolie M. Semancik
2005 WI 139 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP1885-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19955 - 2005-10-13
2005 WI 139 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP1885-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19955 - 2005-10-13
Dale Wiggins v. John C. Butorac
. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case involves Wisconsin Open Records Law, codified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION ¶5 The issue in this case involves Wisconsin Open Records Law, codified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31