Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 30191 for de.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 49
that amount. As also explained below, we disagree. II. ¶9 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31848 - 2014-09-15
that amount. As also explained below, we disagree. II. ¶9 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31848 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in improper and unlawful conduct in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107419 - 2017-09-21
in improper and unlawful conduct in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107419 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
deference, due weight deference, or no deference (de novo review) to an agency’s legal conclusions. McRae
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
State v. Perry A. Felton
decision to admit or exclude evidence comports with legal principles is a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
decision to admit or exclude evidence comports with legal principles is a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
Rural Mutual Insurance Company v. Tracy Welsh
and Wayne’s son. On this de novo review, we conclude that the policies do not unambiguously exclude coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3111 - 2005-03-31
and Wayne’s son. On this de novo review, we conclude that the policies do not unambiguously exclude coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3111 - 2005-03-31
Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
and gauge the persuasiveness of their testimony. See id. at 151-52. We review issues of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31
and gauge the persuasiveness of their testimony. See id. at 151-52. We review issues of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willy J. Love
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS and MARK G. SCHROEDER, Judges.1 Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104924 - 2026-04-14
County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS and MARK G. SCHROEDER, Judges.1 Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1104924 - 2026-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s arguments for the reasons that follow. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29
in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s arguments for the reasons that follow. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29
2007 WI APP 120
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26