Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 29810 for des.
2008 WI APP 49
. As also explained below, we disagree. II. ¶9 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31848 - 2008-03-18
. As also explained below, we disagree. II. ¶9 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31848 - 2008-03-18
2007 WI APP 120
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26
, which we review de novo.[8] Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Bd. of Appeals, 2005 WI App 106, ¶6, 281 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28604 - 2007-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court applied the correct burden of proof. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
the circuit court applied the correct burden of proof. This presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53769 - 2010-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s arguments for the reasons that follow. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29
in creating a de facto sobriety checkpoint.” We reject Teniente’s arguments for the reasons that follow. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107419 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
, prejudicial, are questions of law, however, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49565 - 2010-05-03
, prejudicial, are questions of law, however, that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49565 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91540 - 2014-09-15
assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91540 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30068 - 2014-09-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30068 - 2014-09-15
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Sherry L. Anderson
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31
of fortuity. We agree. We review summary judgments de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Schmidt v. Northern States Power Co., 2007 WI 136, ¶24, 305 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Schmidt v. Northern States Power Co., 2007 WI 136, ¶24, 305 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998886 - 2025-08-21
[PDF]
Zignego Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19
. This determination involves the interpretation of a statute and is therefore a matter that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11087 - 2017-09-19