Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 17453 for ex.
Search results 2241 - 2250 of 17453 for ex.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
surcharge for misdemeanor convictions was an unconstitutional ex post facto punishment when imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155450 - 2017-09-21
surcharge for misdemeanor convictions was an unconstitutional ex post facto punishment when imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed on Regan for crimes committed before the effective date of the statutory change violates the ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134592 - 2017-09-21
imposed on Regan for crimes committed before the effective date of the statutory change violates the ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
ex-wife’s attorney. He acknowledges that “it is potentially awkward to reveal such otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
ex-wife’s attorney. He acknowledges that “it is potentially awkward to reveal such otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be moot because Harris has already completed the sentence.3 See State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
be moot because Harris has already completed the sentence.3 See State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143850 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
us in these appeals. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188017 - 2017-09-21
us in these appeals. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188017 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the effective date of the statutory change violates the ex post facto clause of the Wisconsin and United States
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
the effective date of the statutory change violates the ex post facto clause of the Wisconsin and United States
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
May Table of Unpublished Opinions
† 04-20-2005 Affirmed 2004AP108 State ex rel. Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18541 - 2005-06-14
† 04-20-2005 Affirmed 2004AP108 State ex rel. Stupar River LLC v. Town of Linwood
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18541 - 2005-06-14
State v. Lamont Williams
, 264 Wis. 2d 1, 665 N.W.2d 756; Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d at 181-82; State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
, 264 Wis. 2d 1, 665 N.W.2d 756; Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d at 181-82; State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The validity of the probation revocation is also not before the court here. See State ex rel. Flowers v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776304 - 2024-03-14
). The validity of the probation revocation is also not before the court here. See State ex rel. Flowers v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776304 - 2024-03-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not the subject of this appeal. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22
is not the subject of this appeal. See State ex rel. Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 384, 260 N.W.2d 727 (1978
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22