Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 59320 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Tim D. Johnson v. Major James Zanon
a mattress. Johnson's affidavit claimed he was naked; prison officials claimed he had underwear. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8632 - 2005-03-31
a mattress. Johnson's affidavit claimed he was naked; prison officials claimed he had underwear. In light
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy Moore
, as compared to those of his co‑defendants, and claiming that, unlike him, his co-defendants had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08
, as compared to those of his co‑defendants, and claiming that, unlike him, his co-defendants had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25070 - 2006-05-08
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court declined MacGillis’s offer to testify in support of his ineffective assistance claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138240 - 2015-03-24
. The circuit court declined MacGillis’s offer to testify in support of his ineffective assistance claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138240 - 2015-03-24
CA Blank Order
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
of Markling’s probation. Markling has filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96337 - 2013-05-06
Dean Oschmann v. Secura Insurance
judgment dismissing their claim against Secura Insurance.[1] The dispute arose when Secura refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15557 - 2005-03-31
judgment dismissing their claim against Secura Insurance.[1] The dispute arose when Secura refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15557 - 2005-03-31
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
Watkins’ claim that the sealed submission prevented him from adequately presenting his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
Watkins’ claim that the sealed submission prevented him from adequately presenting his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 806.07 on which he relies, his primary claim for relief appears to be that the bank
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103086 - 2013-10-13
. Stat. § 806.07 on which he relies, his primary claim for relief appears to be that the bank
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103086 - 2013-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
with that, and you’re free to go back to Judge Guolee’s courtroom. ¶4 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144348 - 2015-07-13
with that, and you’re free to go back to Judge Guolee’s courtroom. ¶4 To prove a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144348 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455059 - 2021-11-23
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455059 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106025 - 2017-09-21
and that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106025 - 2017-09-21