Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 57576 for id.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 57576 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the fair, efficient, and orderly administration of justice.” Id., ¶31. The rule enables circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422652 - 2021-09-08
the fair, efficient, and orderly administration of justice.” Id., ¶31. The rule enables circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422652 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
John W. McDonough v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. Id. We turn first to the plain language
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. Id. We turn first to the plain language
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17337 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harris D. Byers
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ontario D. Lowery
the ruling if there is a reasonable basis for it. Id. ¶13 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4432 - 2005-03-31
the ruling if there is a reasonable basis for it. Id. ¶13 In support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4432 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy A. Schill
effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Id. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
effort is made to avoid determinations of ineffectiveness based on hindsight. Id. ¶22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
if his representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57316 - 2014-09-15
if his representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. at 688. O’Donnell must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Harris D. Byers
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature's intent. Id. at 406. In determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
circumstances which the trial court took into account when making the award. Id. at 953, 417 N.W.2d at 409
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14891 - 2017-09-21
circumstances which the trial court took into account when making the award. Id. at 953, 417 N.W.2d at 409
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14891 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21