Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 57351 for id.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
no genuine issue of material fact exists. Id., ¶24. We also must construe the ordinance. This too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21
no genuine issue of material fact exists. Id., ¶24. We also must construe the ordinance. This too
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24711 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry Howard
, which we review de novo. See id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14167 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. See id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14167 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Kurtz
, giving officers reasonable suspicion to stop Kurtz and Fuller. Id. Reasonableness of the Stop ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09
, giving officers reasonable suspicion to stop Kurtz and Fuller. Id. Reasonableness of the Stop ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
limited to those circumstances which the trial court took into account when making the award. Id. at 953
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
limited to those circumstances which the trial court took into account when making the award. Id. at 953
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
duties are not fulfilled at the plea hearing, the defendant may move to withdraw his plea.” Id. at 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231753 - 2019-01-08
duties are not fulfilled at the plea hearing, the defendant may move to withdraw his plea.” Id. at 274
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231753 - 2019-01-08
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Shampo
on the appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶6 A circuit court should freely allow a defendant to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19
on the appropriate and applicable law. Id. ¶6 A circuit court should freely allow a defendant to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6071 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
, and accepted meaning[.]” Id. Because context is important to meaning, we interpret statutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that could have been imposed on him. Id. at 206. ¶14 In State v. Ernst, 2005 WI 107, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610563 - 2023-01-18
that could have been imposed on him. Id. at 206. ¶14 In State v. Ernst, 2005 WI 107, ¶25, 283 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610563 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
WI APP 85
in opposition. See id. at 567. To defeat the motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32637 - 2014-09-15
in opposition. See id. at 567. To defeat the motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32637 - 2014-09-15