Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 22401 - 22410 of 58546 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
residence. The trial court determined that the search was not a probation search as the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
residence. The trial court determined that the search was not a probation search as the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14870 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI App 259
claims that the trial court erred in ruling that WPS must pay Zurich the $350,000 Zurich paid to settle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-12-18
claims that the trial court erred in ruling that WPS must pay Zurich the $350,000 Zurich paid to settle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30842 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Harris
must be turned over within a reasonable time before trial, the State was obligated to disclose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16670 - 2017-09-21
must be turned over within a reasonable time before trial, the State was obligated to disclose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16670 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes “plain error” entitling him to a new trial; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
constitutes “plain error” entitling him to a new trial; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865519 - 2024-10-23
State v. Samuel D. Clay
concerning trial counsel's effectiveness, the sufficiency of the information, the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
concerning trial counsel's effectiveness, the sufficiency of the information, the constitutionality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur J. McCoy
motion. We affirm. ¶2 McCoy first argues that his right to a fair trial was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16302 - 2005-03-31
motion. We affirm. ¶2 McCoy first argues that his right to a fair trial was prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16302 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
credit. The issue is whether the trial court properly computed his sentence credit. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19
credit. The issue is whether the trial court properly computed his sentence credit. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4239 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerry L. Anderson
of the elements the State would have to prove if Anderson went to trial, confirmed the details of Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
of the elements the State would have to prove if Anderson went to trial, confirmed the details of Anderson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11462 - 2017-09-19
State v. Marco A. Delatorre
that the sentence is not infirm. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
that the sentence is not infirm. Sentencing lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and a strong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14676 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
at sentencing. Accepting the prosecution’s recommendation, the trial court withheld sentence and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
at sentencing. Accepting the prosecution’s recommendation, the trial court withheld sentence and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31