Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22411 - 22420 of 82650 for case codes/1000.

Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
consolidated cases, Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District (Lauderdale) and the Town of LaGrange sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7132 - 2005-03-31

Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District v. Armijit Sidhu
consolidated cases, Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District (Lauderdale) and the Town of LaGrange sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7134 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 Double jeopardy does bar retrial in cases of “prosecutorial overreaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187316 - 2017-09-21

Dunn County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
2006 WI App 120 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1917 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25024 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
that he had pled no contest to lesser charges in the present case; when two jurors reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31146 - 2007-12-11

State v. Walter T. Missouri
2006 WI App 74 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1486-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21670 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Lauralynn Stahnke v. Emilio Lontok, M.D.
case it is established by the verdict that defendants were negligent in the treatment of plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9442 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
, 2005 WI 126, 285 Wis. 2d 143, 699 N.W.2d 582, does not apply retroactively to his case because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27309 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
2005 WI 141 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2004AP2093-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20018 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to his case because he is pursuing a collateral appeal rather than a direct appeal. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27309 - 2006-12-04