Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22411 - 22420 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 22411 - 22420 of 58509 for speedy trial.
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
at sentencing. Accepting the prosecution’s recommendation, the trial court withheld sentence and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
at sentencing. Accepting the prosecution’s recommendation, the trial court withheld sentence and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
personal injury claim. The trial court allowed the County’s subrogation claim despite its failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
personal injury claim. The trial court allowed the County’s subrogation claim despite its failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Teresa Greene-Ashley v. Bruce Greene
children, contrary to the terms of their divorce judgment.1 At the contempt hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12400 - 2017-09-21
children, contrary to the terms of their divorce judgment.1 At the contempt hearing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12400 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Buck
of trial counsel. Buck argues that his counsel was ineffective because he did not convince Buck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15453 - 2017-09-21
of trial counsel. Buck argues that his counsel was ineffective because he did not convince Buck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of one count of first-degree intentional homicide. We first address his argument that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90204 - 2014-09-15
of one count of first-degree intentional homicide. We first address his argument that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Andrew J.N. v. Wendy L.D.
the trial court’s order in 1992. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld our decision in 1993. Meanwhile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16148 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s order in 1992. The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld our decision in 1993. Meanwhile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16148 - 2017-09-21
Troy R. Gainer v. Paulette J. Lockwood
. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court must conduct an in camera inspection of the records to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15566 - 2005-03-31
. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court must conduct an in camera inspection of the records to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
into the following categories, and we can do no better:2 (1) the trial court was prejudiced against Moore because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
into the following categories, and we can do no better:2 (1) the trial court was prejudiced against Moore because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court properly denied his claim of ineffective trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27292 - 2014-09-15
the trial court properly denied his claim of ineffective trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 The State charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27292 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Judi Ann Koonce v. George Earl Koonce
sum of $75,000. The trial court concluded that the agreement was unambiguous and required George
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2944 - 2017-09-19
sum of $75,000. The trial court concluded that the agreement was unambiguous and required George
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2944 - 2017-09-19