Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 68347 for did.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
charged and sentenced as a repeat offender because the complaint did not specify the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 2020. It then rescheduled the hearing for September 21, 2020. Woodward did not appear. Accordingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=720888 - 2023-11-01

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
conceded, however, that when he stopped the truck, “he did not know what it weighed.” Deputy Hollman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5599 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 1, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
court did on May 12, 2005, he does not present a developed argument, except to say that sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28257 - 2007-02-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
of these other states; the employer’s new work procedures prevented her from complying; and her employer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28347 - 2007-03-07

COURT OF APPEALS
lights were lit. And, the court specifically stated that it did not “buy” Grenie’s brother’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54713 - 2010-09-22

State v. Robert A. Zimmerlee
confinement and two years of extended supervision. ¶3 Zimmerlee did not file a direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24943 - 2006-05-01

State v. Glen Blanke
options and Blanke's criminal history demonstrate that he did not receive ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8480 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jerome M. Zimmermann
, because he believed that trial counsel did not adequately preserve the issue. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7561 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert W. Miller
: did the circuit court misuse its discretion when it denied Miller Huber law privileges under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2410 - 2005-03-31