Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 46129 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 46129 for paternity test paper work.
State v. George A. King
). “There is no set test for determining whether the trial court [erroneously exercised] its discretion. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
). “There is no set test for determining whether the trial court [erroneously exercised] its discretion. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and brackets in original). “The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149120 - 2017-09-21
and brackets in original). “The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Dibble
-only” test created in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). Under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4988 - 2017-09-19
-only” test created in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). Under this test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4988 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William L. Morford
to approach claims for relief under § 806.07(1)(h) is to apply the “extraordinary circumstances” test. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4377 - 2017-09-19
to approach claims for relief under § 806.07(1)(h) is to apply the “extraordinary circumstances” test. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4377 - 2017-09-19
State v. William L. Morford
the “extraordinary circumstances” test. Under this test, the court must consider whether extraordinary circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
the “extraordinary circumstances” test. Under this test, the court must consider whether extraordinary circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 195
, it is not without exceptions. Walton, 361 F.3d at 433. A trial may be closed only when the test set out in Press
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29514 - 2014-09-15
, it is not without exceptions. Walton, 361 F.3d at 433. A trial may be closed only when the test set out in Press
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29514 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing and therefore, per se ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing and therefore, per se ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Milwaukee. Officer Foy administered several standardized field sobriety tests to Martin, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193662 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee. Officer Foy administered several standardized field sobriety tests to Martin, which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an objective test. The test is “[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances known to the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
an objective test. The test is “[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances known to the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James L. Holloway
-2474-CR 94-3144-CR -4- prongs of the Strickland test. See Saunders, 196 Wis.2d at 51, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19
-2474-CR 94-3144-CR -4- prongs of the Strickland test. See Saunders, 196 Wis.2d at 51, 538
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19