Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 46137 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Smith
Underwager did not base his opinion on his personal examination of Smith. He administered tests to Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
). The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22

Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
complaints of chest congestion and dry cough. Dr. Singh ordered tests that included an EKG, and interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
’ that the action taken was appropriate?” This test applies to the stopping of a vehicle and detention of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4872 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
subsequent testing determined to contain methamphetamine. ¶6 Traczyk did not testify about how long he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=360456 - 2021-04-27

[PDF] State v. Todd M. Beyersdorf
) and (24), STATS. ¶5 To establish ineffective assistance of counsel a two-part test must be satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14921 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
’ that the action taken was appropriate?” This test applies to the stopping of a vehicle and detention of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4871 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
was tested and determined to be cocaine base. The officers’ discovery of cocaine in the booking room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33912 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The test to determine whether newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial has five factors: (1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192178 - 2017-09-21

State v. Arden Krueger
test for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim requires a defendant to prove (1) deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2542 - 2005-03-31