Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 83479 for simple case search.
Search results 22421 - 22430 of 83479 for simple case search.
John Gillen v. City of Neenah
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2470 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17147 - 2014-11-18
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-2470 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17147 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Crawford)
Case 2025XX001438 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Cr... Filed 11-25-2025 Page 1 of 6
/supreme/docs/25xx1438crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25
Case 2025XX001438 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Cr... Filed 11-25-2025 Page 1 of 6
/supreme/docs/25xx1438crawford.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court dismissing his case due to untimeliness and because Singh had already exhausted all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
of the circuit court dismissing his case due to untimeliness and because Singh had already exhausted all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1068769 - 2026-01-27
State v. Earl W. Haase
2006 WI App 86 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP987-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
2006 WI App 86 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP987-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
Diane L. C. v. Michael D. P.
We considered this case earlier this year. On February 22, we granted Michael D.P.’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18393 - 2017-09-21
We considered this case earlier this year. On February 22, we granted Michael D.P.’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18393 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
not waive its jurisdictional objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
not waive its jurisdictional objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955642 - 2025-05-13
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955642 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
a manifest injustice. We affirm.1 ¶2 In February 2007, the State filed case number 07-CF-85 against Sell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15
a manifest injustice. We affirm.1 ¶2 In February 2007, the State filed case number 07-CF-85 against Sell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36676 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955642 - 2025-05-13
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955642 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case is dismissed. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15
objection. As a result, the circuit court order is affirmed and the case is dismissed. I. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53101 - 2014-09-15