Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 29713 for des.
2009 WI APP 171
the application of Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41828 - 2009-11-23
the application of Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4) to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41828 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
WI APP 36
from the order and the judgment. Standard of Review ¶6 “We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35446 - 2014-09-15
from the order and the judgment. Standard of Review ¶6 “We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35446 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sauk County v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
Our standard of review of summary judgments is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9078 - 2017-09-19
Our standard of review of summary judgments is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9078 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 277. However, we review de novo the circuit court’s application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295285 - 2020-10-14
N.W.2d 277. However, we review de novo the circuit court’s application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295285 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
Ronald Binon v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
. 1985). An appeal from a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12209 - 2017-09-21
. 1985). An appeal from a grant of summary judgment raises an issue of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Candace M. Sorenson v. Howard E. Sorenson
affirm in part and reverse in part. We review issues of law de novo. Support and maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7881 - 2017-09-19
affirm in part and reverse in part. We review issues of law de novo. Support and maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7881 - 2017-09-19
Charles F. Kozlik v. Gulf Insurance Company
the interest award. We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6079 - 2005-03-31
the interest award. We review the validity of a statutory settlement offer de novo. See Staehler v. Beuthin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Myers
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10115 - 2017-09-19
counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10115 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239270 - 2019-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a specified address on Saint Joseph’s Street in De Pere on July 1, 2015. ¶3 On April 15, 2015, a Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235921 - 2019-02-26
to a specified address on Saint Joseph’s Street in De Pere on July 1, 2015. ¶3 On April 15, 2015, a Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235921 - 2019-02-26