Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 57221 for id.

[PDF] State v. Joseph Williams
.” Id. at 300, 560 N.W.2d at 298. In Green, we compared the two statutes and commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
that reaffirmation agreements strictly comply with the conditions enumerated in the statute.” Id. at 849 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109596 - 2014-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in question. See id., ¶35. “[O]n certiorari review, there is a presumption of correctness and validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143684 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. See id., ¶9. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 940.225(3) governs third-degree sexual assault. It provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62727 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
testimony. Id., ¶¶4-6. We reference additional pertinent facts in the Discussion section below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189520 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 85
in opposition. See id. at 567. To defeat the motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32637 - 2014-09-15

State v. William Speener
appeal.’” Id. (quoted source omitted). Procedurally, a § 974.06 motion follows a motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14305 - 2005-03-31

State v. Edward T.
disposition of cases. Id. ¶6 Although the Wisconsin Supreme Court has strongly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21562 - 2006-02-27

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. at 634. However, whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107968 - 2014-02-12

COURT OF APPEALS
recollection of the witness’s initial encounter with the suspect.” Id. (citation omitted). The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16