Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 29662 for name.
Search results 22431 - 22440 of 29662 for name.
State v. Robert M. May
she did not identify May in her 911 call to the police, she identified him by name and physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
she did not identify May in her 911 call to the police, she identified him by name and physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald E. Powers
to support a reasonable suspicion that Powers had been driving while intoxicated—namely, the strong odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12706 - 2017-09-21
to support a reasonable suspicion that Powers had been driving while intoxicated—namely, the strong odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12706 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald E. Powers
intoxicated—namely, the strong odor of intoxicants and Powers’ inability, either physically or mentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12706 - 2005-03-31
intoxicated—namely, the strong odor of intoxicants and Powers’ inability, either physically or mentally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12706 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the 2 We note that throughout the record, the victim’s name is spelled as both Edwynn and Edwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70312 - 2014-09-15
the 2 We note that throughout the record, the victim’s name is spelled as both Edwynn and Edwin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70312 - 2014-09-15
Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments
on the first mortgage, and HSB commenced this foreclosure action. CNB was named as a defendant because it held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
on the first mortgage, and HSB commenced this foreclosure action. CNB was named as a defendant because it held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiencies”). That instruction, WIS JI—CRIMINAL 245, reads: You have heard testimony from (name accomplice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
deficiencies”). That instruction, WIS JI—CRIMINAL 245, reads: You have heard testimony from (name accomplice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66224 - 2014-09-15
Certification
in a civil action by the victim named in the restitution order. Id. In deciding
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2008-06-24
in a civil action by the victim named in the restitution order. Id. In deciding
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court, namely, whether the November 19, 2012 order required clarification. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court, namely, whether the November 19, 2012 order required clarification. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143868 - 2017-09-21
State v. Isace A. Whiting
and circumstances. And, again, I’m limiting my decision to the information that’s in this record, namely the sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5415 - 2005-03-31
and circumstances. And, again, I’m limiting my decision to the information that’s in this record, namely the sworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5415 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
—namely, that his sentence was excessive. See State v. Magnuson, 220 Wis. 2d 468, 471-72, 583 N.W.2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
—namely, that his sentence was excessive. See State v. Magnuson, 220 Wis. 2d 468, 471-72, 583 N.W.2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08